logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.04.18 2013고단125
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the city bus C.

On November 13, 2012, the Defendant driven the above bus on the 15:35th day of November 13, 2012, and driven it along the two lanes in front of the “Magsan Police Station”, “In the direction of the “Magsan Police Station”, the Defendant driven through the luminous viewing “on the side”.

Since there are an intersection and crosswalk in which signal apparatus is installed, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in violating and immediately proceeding with an intersection signal while the crossing signal was changed to a stop signal, and the Defendant was placed on the left side of the victim D (the age of 11) who was standing a crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals from the direction of the Madle Madle 4 Complex to the Madle Madle Madern.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered approximately 12 weeks of the above occupational negligence from the victim’s “influence aggregate,” which requires medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant reflects his fault in depth and that the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant separately from

arrow