The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. 항소이유의 요지 이 사건 각 범행은 피고인이 술에 취한 상태로 교통사고를 일으켜 3명의 피해자들로 하여금 상해를 입게 하고도 아무런 조치를 취하지 않고 도주하였을 뿐만 아니라 J에 대하여 피고인과 강제로 성관계를 가졌다고 허위 내용의 고소장을 제출하여 J을 무고하고, K에 대한 창원지방법원 진주지원 2013고정354호 상해 사건의 증인으로 출석하여 K로부터 빰을 맞고 목 부분을 잡혔다고 허위의 진술을 하여 위증한 것으로 그 사안이 중하고 죄질이 좋지 아니한 점, 이 사건 위증 범행에 관하여 K가 피고인에 대한 엄벌을 탄원하고 있는 점 등에 비추어 보면, 원심이 선고한 형(징역 1년에 집행유예 2년, 보호관찰, 사회봉사명령 200시간)은 너무 가벼워서 부당하다.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the judgment prosecutor, the defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case and reflects the depth thereof, the defendant voluntarily attended the district zone after the occurrence of the traffic accident of this case, the defendant was subject to investigation, the victim F, G, H and original agreement with the victim of the traffic accident of this case, the vehicle of the defendant's driving is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, the defendant's vehicle is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and the J does not have any punishment against the defendant under the agreement with the J and only with the intent of the defendant, and the defendant led to the confession of the above crime of this case before the confirmation of the above injury case against K on July 10, 2014, which was acquitted from the appellate court of this case (Seoul District Court Decision 2013No2580) and confirmed the judgment of the above innocence, the defendant has no record of punishment as a result of the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act and the crime of violation of the Building Act, and the circumstances and circumstances of each of this case after the crime.