logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2016.08.23 2016고단76
약사법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act and the Trademark Act shall sell or acquire drugs for the purpose of sale, sell goods identical with or similar to the designated goods on which another person's registered trademark is indicated, or possess such goods for the purpose of transfer or delivery without legitimate authority to use such trademark;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who is the U.S. interest professional cz in the U.S. as designated goods, had a drug registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office as a trademark registration number C using the drug for treating disorder in skills, as the designated goods. On December 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had and purchased a fake 640 crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt crypt cryp in Gangwon-gun, and sold it by mail from that date to March 12,

1. As described in all, seven times in the same manner, the drug was sold or acquired for the purpose of sale, and the trademark right was infringed upon by a person other than the pharmacy founder, such as holding to transfer or deliver the said fake 640 scatis, by taking 720,000 won in total.

2. A list of crimes in attached Form, including the act of sexual traffic, committed by the Defendant in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the act of arranging sexual traffic, in a manner that he/she received 50,000 won in cash from H located in the North-gun G G in the early December 2, 2013, from 50,000 won in cash from

2. In all as described, sexual intercourse was conducted in the same way on five occasions, and sexual intercourse was conducted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to J, K, L, M, N, E,O, and I;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1.Each.

arrow