logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.11.07 2017고정458
상표법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person other than a pharmacy founder who violates the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act may sell or acquire medicines for the purpose of sale;

Nevertheless, from January 2017 to June 5, 2017, the Defendant purchased and kept 103 Mada 188 Mada Mada 188 Mada Mada 188 Mada Mada, a Mada Mada Mada Mada Mada, a Mada Mada Mada Mada Mada Mada Mada Mada, which was a Mada Mada Mada Mada Mada, which was classified as a specialized medicine from ordinary customers who find the place for the purpose of sale.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired drugs for the purpose of sale even though he was not a pharmacy founder.

2. No person who violates the Trademark Act shall deliver, sell, forge, imitate, or possess a trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark for the purpose of using it on goods identical or similar to the designated goods, or for the purpose of allowing such person to use it;

The goods acquired and kept by the Defendant as described in paragraph 1 are protegra with the same trademark as “pfgr, VGR100” that applied for a product designated as a medicine for treatment of functional disorder from “Fgrhrhrhrrrrr,” and “Iriri LELC” with the same trademark attached thereto as “C20, C100” of “Iriri LDC,” which applied for a product designated as a medicine for treatment of sexual function disorder.

Nevertheless, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant acquired a fake eggs lease 103 square meters in which the trademark identical to the registration trademark of Sagra was inscribed, for the purpose of selling the same trademark as the registration trademark of Sagra, and the trademark of Sagra was identical to the registered trademark of Sagra.

Accordingly, the defendant infringed another person's trademark right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Seizure records;

1. Reporting of internal investigation (a disguised transaction and request for appraisal;

arrow