logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.18 2012고단2092
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, for one year and two months, and for one year and one year and one year, respectively.

, however, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On May 7, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Narcotics Control Act (narcotics), etc. at the Incheon District Court on May 7, 2010, and sentenced to 2 years of suspension of execution on May 15, 2010. On January 27, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) at the Seoul Central District Court and finally decided on August 30, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On December 31, 2009, the Defendants conspired to acquire money by manipulating the machinery with a stude agreement while placing golf to the victim H in the indoor screen golf driving range.

피고인들은 2009. 12. 31.경 고양시 일산서구 I 피고인 C이 운영하는 ‘J’에서, 미리 준비해 온 USB를 골프연습장 컴퓨터에 꽂고 프로그램이 설치되면 리모컨으로 화면방향을 조작할 수 있도록 한 후, 피해자와 내기골프를 쳐서 각 홀마다 타수만큼 순위를 정하고, 꼴찌가 1, 2, 3등에게, 3등이 1, 2등에게, 2등이 1등에게 타수 차이만큼 돈을 주는 방식(1타당 5만 원에서 40만 원)으로 내기골프를 치던 중, 피해자가 타석에서 공을 칠 때 리모컨으로 화면방향을 몰래 바꾸어 이를 모르는 피해자가 공을 원하는 방향으로 제대로 칠 수 없도록 기망하여, 이에 속은 피해자로부터 그 자리에서 약 500만 원을 교부받아 이를 편취하였다.

B. The Defendants committed the crime of January 3, 2010 from January 3, 2010 to January 04:00, 201, in the J from January 3, 2010 to January 4, 2010, by deceiving the victim by the same method, and deceiving the victim from the victim, approximately KRW 12,80,000,00 in the facts charged against the crime of approximately KRW 12,00 in the same place, but in full view of the evidence of this case, it is recognized that the Defendants acquired approximately KRW 12,00,00 by deception.

Since the part of KRW 800,000 is a single crime with approximately KRW 12,00,000 which is found guilty, the decision does not contain a separate verdict of innocence.

recipient of the order.

arrow