1. On April 25, 2017, the Defendant’s decision of non-conformity with the payment of basic pension benefits against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person aged 65 years or older, who was recognized as a beneficiary of a basic pension pursuant to Article 3 of the Basic Pension Act from January 2010, and received a basic pension. From April 2014, the Plaintiff is a person whose payment of a basic pension is suspended on the grounds of exceeding the recognized amount of income.

B. Around March 3, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for payment of a basic pension with the Defendant pursuant to Article 10 of the Elementary Pension Act. Accordingly, as a result of the investigation of the property of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s spouse (B) (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s husband and wife”), the Plaintiff acquired on August 7, 2013 and sold on December 27, 2015, but calculated the property value of the Plaintiff’s monthly recognized income of the Plaintiff’s husband and wife as KRW 4,937,716, including the calculation of the value of the instant land as KRW 1,573,789,086.

4,671,679 won, 679 won, converted into general property (general property value of 1,573,789,086 won - General property value of 37,285,358 won - Fundamental property value of 135,00,000 won - 49,52,000 won, financial property value of 98,507 won, converted into general property of this case - Basic financial property value of 20,000,00 won - Basic financial property value of 98,507 won - Basic financial property value of 20,000,000 won

C. On April 25, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that “The monthly recognized amount of income (4,937,716 won) of the Plaintiff’s husband and wife exceeds the standard amount of basic pension selection (1,904,000 won per month) in 2017.”

(hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"). . [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1, 2, 8, 9, 11 through 15, Eul's statements in Gap's 1 through 5, Eul's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Details of the instant disposition

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that both the purchase fund of the land of this case and the new construction cost of the building of this case are invested or leased from E.