A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On October 24, 2015, at around 18:40, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with a motor vehicle without a motor vehicle driver's license, along the four-lane road in front of the airfield shooting distance, which is inciting the right zone at Suwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Article 152 of the relevant Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines concerning the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to be confined in the workhouses are against the defendant, the defendant's driving without the license of this case during the period of the same criminal convictions, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc. shall be considered in consideration of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the defendant's age, sex, and environment

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle for Eing agreement.

On October 24, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 18:40 on October 24, 2015, and led to a four-lane road in front of the airfield distance, which is inciting the right of way in the sphere of the Suwon-si, along the two-lanes from the parallel point in Suwon-si to the parallel point in Suwon-si.

At the same time, the victim F (V, 42 years old) was driving a G CCB car on the left side of the defendant's front left side, and thus, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to change the lane in order to give notice of change of course when changing the lane to the driver of the vehicle, to ensure that the driver of the vehicle is able to properly consider the traffic conditions before and after the change of the lane, and to avoid changing the course when it is likely to obstruct the normal traffic of other vehicles.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and changed the lane into a one-lane, and the back side of the documentary car driven by the victim was shocked into the left side of the motor vehicle operated by the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence.