Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 26, 2016, around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) called “C” restaurant located in king-si B, and went to the said restaurant; (b) on February 27, 2016, around 1 hour, the Defendant: (c) searched the said restaurant as the above restaurant while drinking around 0:00; (d) requested the receipt; (c) provided the said restaurant with a bather, sound, and phoe the said restaurant.

Accordingly, the above restaurant operator reported to 112, and the circumstances belonging to the D District, E, and F, upon receipt of the report, called the patrol car to the above site.

The above security guards called to the restaurant E stated that “I am to the restaurant principal and there is no receipt certificate,” and the restaurant principal stated the details and amount of meals in the blank, and the Defendant, the Defendant, and the Defendant, who received it and tried to go to the patrol vehicle parked in front of the restaurant.

The reason why E is the defect that E returns to the defendant's house, and the defendant must move to and leave the house.

Chewing swelth, swelthal swelthal swelthal

Absted bitch bitch, sonh, etc., and tried to go to the patrol vehicle continuously, and the circumstances leading up to this, E returned to the Defendant’s house, and the Defendant took the face of E one time due to his own drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made by E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order - The defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his mistake, and the first offender