1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The defendant of the purport of the claim shall make the plaintiff ① on 2017.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the part of the judgment of the first instance except for the supplement of judgment as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, the court's explanation as to this case is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Supplement of judgment

A. The defendant asserts as follows.

According to the defendant's disability determination criteria, after conducting a hearing-oriented test at least three times, it is necessary to determine the disability according to the average of the sound recorded values.

However, the first instance court has only one time test and has determined the rate of disability on the left side as 15% with the result of the hearing test. Therefore, it is necessary to correct it.

B. Therefore, we look at.

당심에서의 을지대학교병원장에 대한 신체감정촉탁에 회신결과에 의하면, 위 촉탁기관이 피고의 기준에 따라 원고에 대하여 추가로 2018. 6. 27.과 2018. 7. 11.에 순음 청력검사를 실시한 결과 왼쪽 귀는 전농(全聾)으로 측정된 사실, 이어 청성 뇌간 반응 검사를 추가로 실시한 결과 오른쪽 귀의 경우 40dB nHL, 왼쪽 귀의 경우 90dB nHL에서 V파가 형성된 사실 및 그 결과 원고의 왼쪽 귀 장해율은 15%로 감정된 사실이 인정된다.

C. Therefore, the defendant's argument cannot be accepted, since it can be known that the result of appraisal in the trial is different from that in the first trial.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.