logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.08.20 2014가단31608
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall pay to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 22,440,049 and its payment from September 14, 2014.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire argument in Gap evidence No. 1 as to the claim of this lawsuit, the plaintiff can be acknowledged that from November 2013 to February 2014, the plaintiff was not paid the price of goods equivalent to KRW 38,048,549, which was supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff has a duty to pay the plaintiff the price of goods in the balance of the above goods amounting to KRW 22,440,49,490 (= KRW 38,048,549,809,700) due to a partial defect in the part of the original part supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant, and the defendant's 7,008,700 won was deducted from the price of goods due to the transportation of the original part by an aircraft which is not a ship but a ship. Thus, barring special circumstances, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the price of goods to the plaintiff.

2. The judgment on the defendant's defense and counter-claim claim is that the defendant did not deliver the clothing production cost (11,698,500 won due to the increase in the salary cost due to the change of the clothing production plant from Indonesia to China, ② the cost of living land purchased to create a new original unit, ③ the increase in the transportation cost due to the transport of the original unit to the aircraft by the aircraft instead of the vessel, ④ the minimum quantity necessary to display the goods to the store in order to comply with the payment period for the company C, ④ the cost of transporting the goods by the aircraft instead of the vessel, ④ KRW 7,758,00,414,00, ⑤ the cost of transporting the goods by the aircraft to the store in place of the vessel in order to comply with the payment period for the finished product inspection, ④ the cost of manufacturing the goods in custody of the defendant and the amount of damages against the plaintiff's claim against the plaintiff as set off against the above amount of damages against the plaintiff.

Whether defects, such as opening, closing, etc., have occurred in the original body supplied by the Plaintiff.

arrow