A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On September 4, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) on May 13, 2010, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Northern District Court.

On the other hand, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court on January 24, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 12, 2013 (the termination of execution on September 3, 2013), but the above crime, which became final and conclusive, committed before the judgment became final and conclusive on September 3, 2013, is a crime committed before the judgment became final and conclusive on the first head, and thus, there is no possibility that each of the instant crimes was tried together with each of the instant crimes, and thus, the instant

【Criminal Facts】

"2013 Highest 1607"

1. Fraud against victim F;

A. On October 201, the Defendant rendered a false statement that “H” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, which received clothes from Japan, and then exported the victim F after being processed in Korea and Vietnam. At the same time, the Defendant received an order of KRW 210,000 from Japan for female use and sought a full order of KRW 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for the first time to reduce the processing to USD 80,000 per 1 punishment.”

However, there was no fact that only 2.10,000 copies were ordered in Japan, and there was no intention or ability to reduce the processing to the victim because there was no fact that the original part was sought.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 37 million won from the victim to the national bank account under the name of the Defendant I on October 27, 2011.

B. On November 1, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim stating that “The cash is insufficient to place an order for the original contractor after Chinese business trip. Only 30 million won is remitted and then will be processed for women without a mold.”

However, the fact did not require the money to order the prime contractor, and even if it received the money, there was no intention or ability to pay it or to process it for women.

The Defendant is identical to this.