The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On November 14, 2013, the summary of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant had access to “Twitter”, an Internet social network service, at the Defendant’s house located in Gangnam-si B on November 14, 2013; (b) the victim C sing the Defendant, singing the Defendant, citing music with the Defendant’s whereabouts, living with women, or obsescing with women, or obscing the recording room; (c) even though there was no fact that, for the purpose of slandering the Defendant, the Defendant has fully created the nature that he directly created the number of descendants until the low-Nener’s tape recording room. Furthermore, the Defendant got loved her delivery. This request was constantly made within 1 year, and it continued to reveal the Defendant’s reputation or defamation through an information and communications network, including false information, from 130 days to 19 days to 207.37 days to 14 days to 207.

2. Each of the facts charged of the instant case is a crime falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. or Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the intent specifically manifested by the victim pursuant to Article 70(3) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., or can be prosecuted only when a criminal complaint is filed pursuant to

However, according to the agreement bound in the trial records and the written withdrawal of a complaint, the victim C expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case, or cancelled his/her complaint.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.