The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 20:00 on August 16, 2012, the Defendant was sufficiently divided into the charges on the grounds that the victim B (years 52) was not flicked with himself/herself and is not flick with other people in the steel park.

The Defendant, while putting the victim’s bath “this franchise,” committed assault to the victim by force on twice the victim’s left ice franchis.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, on October 30, 2013, after the institution of the instant indictment, a written agreement was submitted by the victim that expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant. Thus, the instant indictment was dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.