1. The Plaintiff, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2, shall:

A. As to shares of Defendant B, C, D, and E, 29/145, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. Land ownership Nos. 1 and 2 of this case 1) The land indicated in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the attached Table Nos. 1 of the Plaintiff’s ownership (hereinafter “instant land Nos. 1 and 2”).

On September 15, 1977, five children, including Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant E, and the Plaintiff’s wife, who are the Plaintiff’s wife, filed for the registration of ownership transfer on September 12, 1977 with respect to one-fifths of shares on the ground of donation on September 12, 1977. 2) The networkO died on November 27, 1986, and jointly inherited the property of the deceased P (6/29) and the Plaintiff, who is the wife’s children (the wife’s heir, Australia, 6/29), Defendant F, G, H, I (the inheritance portion 4/29), and Defendant J (the inheritance portion other than the same husband, the inheritance portion 1/29).

3) After the deceased on February 2, 2012, the deceased on the part of the deceased on February 2, 2012, the deceased on the part of the Plaintiff, Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant H, Defendant I, Defendant J, and Defendant J jointly inherited the deceased’s property (as to the shares of 1/5 on the register in the name of the deceasedO among the land Nos. 1 and 2, the registration of inheritance has not been completed up until now. However, if the shares of 1/2 are inherited according to the above shares, the shares of 1 and 2 in the ownership of the instant land are as listed below [Attachment 1].

[Attachment 1] Defendant B 29/145 (i.e., 1/5) (i.e., 1/5) Defendant C’s ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership ownership.

B. The land adjacent to the land Nos. 3 and 4 of this case 1 and 2 of this case is owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the land Nos. 3 and 4 of this case”), and the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case.