1. The Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the network D:

(a) Defendant (Appointed Party) is 15,227,92 and 15,27.

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and the entire arguments as to the cause of the claim, D, on September 30, 2016, borrowed KRW 47,000,00 from the plaintiff at a rate of 15% for delay damages, D (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on May 29, 2018. The Defendant (Appointed) who is the deceased’s wife, the appointed party C, the appointed party, the E, and the F filed a report on the inheritance-type approval (the Daejeon Family Court’s argument support 2018), and the above court rendered a ruling to accept the report on October 11, 201, and recognized the fact that the loan principal remaining as of December 11, 2018 remains as the ground for delay damages.

According to the above facts, the Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, and the Defendant (Appointed Party) is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated by the agreement rate of 15% from December 12, 2018 to December 12, 2018, as the Plaintiff seeks against the loan of KRW 15,227,92 (the principal of loan of KRW 35,531,980 x the amount of loan of KRW 35,531,980 x the amount of loan of KRW 35,57,940 x the amount of loan of KRW 34,367,946 x the amount of loan of KRW 3/7) and each of them (the amount of loan of KRW 35,531,980 x the amount of loan of KRW 2/7) and damages for delay of the agreement of KRW 15% from December 12, 2018.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.