logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.05.09 2013고단510
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Criminal power is currently under probation after being sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution on May 27, 2011, in the case of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicle) in the Support of the Gwangju District Court on May 19, 201.

Criminal facts

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA franchise low XG car in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing).

On December 23, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license on December 23, 2012, and driven the said car along the three-lane road in front of the inncheonnam Hospital, which is located in the seafarer's Dong at the time of leisure, along the two-lanes from the front side of the innunnam Hospital to the private distance of the new apartment.

In such a case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brakes of the motor vehicle and prevent accidents in advance, but the defendant did not discover the victim E (the age of 47) who crosses the road to the right side from the left side of the Roman by neglecting his/her duty of care, and did not discover the victim E (the age of 47) who crosses the road to the right side, and did not go beyond the road by taking the victim's right side side side side, the front part of the motor vehicle and the front glass.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the above victim, such as a wound-free booming blood relative, etc., with which the above victim cannot be identified, and led to an unidentified state, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated D's franchise XG car that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place of the foregoing paragraph 1.

(i) the evidence;

arrow