A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On October 13, 2015, the Defendant was seated at the back seat of the police box D, located in C, at the Seoyangyang Police Station D, where he was pushed on October 13, 2015, to his assistant E while driving a taxi on October 13, 2015.

F and G reported to the effect that “The punishment is changed because F and G met the right shoulder due to drinking,” and prepared a statement report by a witness.

However, the fact was that G, F, and the defendant started the taxi first before passengers get on the taxi at the time, but G, and F did not assault the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant raised F and G free will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H;

1. Protocols concerning the F and G prosecutorial offices and police suspects;

1. Part of the statement made by the police against the defendant in each protocol of the police;

1. Report on occurrence [Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault, etc. against drivers);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify each psychological analysis and video recording consent, and the results of psychological physiological tests;

1. Relevant Article 156 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. At the early stage of the investigation of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence, both G and F revealing that “I” is the largest person of G and F with respect to the personal information of G, and there is a circumstance such as hiding it, as a result of the psychological examination of G and F, that “it is impossible to determine”.

However, in full view of the following facts and circumstances admitted by the evidence of the judgment, the facts charged in the judgment are all found guilty, and the above facts are not interfered with.

1. H has a string of the Defendant to board a taxi, and the Defendant also has a boomed a meal at the State boomed by H’s wife. As such, H and the Defendant have been aware of and are engaged in personnel affairs since five years prior to the instant transfer.

The defendant is also aware of the circumstances in which H retires public officials in technical service and assists them in restaurants operated by the wife and his family members.

2. H shall be G. G.