logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.12.15 2016가합20845
회계장부 등 열람 등사 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant has the plaintiff within seven days after the day when this judgment became final and conclusive (09:0 to 18:00).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling additives of high molecules, the stability in treatment of industrial wastes, receptors, and other chemical drugs. The Plaintiff is a shareholder holding 431,600 shares (17.22%) out of 2,506,199 shares issued by the Defendant.

B. On November 16, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) issued shares 1,00,000 shares of the Defendant in a third party on December 9, 2014 in a situation where: (b) the Defendant’s representative director Company B incurred a large amount of provisional payments for his/her own personal interest; (c) accumulated most of the said provisional payments as the bad debt allowance; and (d) whether there is an urgent need for management; and (c) issued shares 1,00,000 in a third party manner; and (d) allocated them to his/her employees; and (e) issued them; and (e) issued them; and (e) issued certificates of contents to seek inspection and verification of the account books and documents as listed in the attached Table 2, on the ground that it is intended to verify the appropriateness of the

C. On November 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) the circumstances cited by the Plaintiff as the grounds for the Plaintiff’s request for inspection and copying are unfair and abstract; and (b) the scope of the claim is too wide; (c) thus, the Plaintiff cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s request; (d) however, the Defendant sent a document verifying the purport that the Plaintiff would cooperate with the Plaintiff’s request for the submission of specific

On November 20, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Cheongju District Court for a provisional disposition seeking to inspect the books and documents listed in the attached Table 2, but was dismissed on February 12, 2016.

(Reasons for Recognition) Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 7, Eul evidence No. 16, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The representative director of the plaintiff defendant 1 of the parties' assertion borrowed the company's funds without permission for personal interest.

arrow