1. The minutes of the meeting of the board of directors from January 2010 to June 2012, among the lawsuits of this case that are changed in exchange at the trial.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation on this part is as follows: ① the part of "the representative director of the defendant," the third and fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance, as "the former representative director of the defendant," ② the part of the sixth and the 12th of the judgment of the court of first instance "...." The Seoul Central District Court accepted the above administrator's claim and rendered a decision of denial against the plaintiffs. Accordingly, the plaintiff corporation A filed a lawsuit seeking an objection against the above denial's decision as Seoul Central District Court 2013Gahap754, the Seoul Central District Court 2013Gadan26718, the Seoul Central District Court 2014Na29010 and the Seoul Central District Court 2014Na14275, respectively, and the plaintiff corporation Eul filed an appeal with the Seoul Central District Court 2016Da16275, Feb. 16, 2015."

3. In addition to the original list of applications, the corresponding part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance (from No. 6 to No. 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance) is the same as the corresponding part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is as the defendant's shareholder, and on the following grounds, clarify the authenticity of all suspicions in the management of the defendant, and where necessary, with a view to taking legal measures to compensate for losses suffered by the defendant or his shareholders due to the illegal performance of duties by the defendant management, the defendant requested the defendant to inspect books and documents, but the defendant rejected the above plaintiffs' claim without justifiable grounds.

Therefore, the defendant.