beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 29, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,00,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, a fine of KRW 2.5 million in the same court on March 10, 2006, and a fine of KRW 2.5 million in the same court on April 12, 2006 to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on May 29, 2008, 8 months of suspension of execution, two years of suspension of execution, two months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, and two years of suspension of execution with the same court on September 16, 2010.
On January 19, 2013, at around 22:40, the Defendant driven a C-Habbin vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.056% from the 1km section to the roads in front of the Sejong-dong Middle School in the same Gu from the roads in front of the Sejong-dong, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving;
1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;
1. Relevant Articles 148 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (the grounds for probationary mitigation below);
1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution) (Article 62(1) of the same Act on the Suspension of Execution is very poor in the quality of the crime by driving under drinking, even though the defendant was sentenced to a three-time suspended sentence from a court due to drinking driving, in consideration of the fact that the defendant makes a confession and reflects on his/her ability, exceeds 0.0% which is the
1. Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act concerning probation, community service or order to attend lectures;