1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as the Plaintiff KRW 35,860,795 and as a result, from June 1, 2017 to August 9, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person running civil engineering, design and survey business, etc., and the Defendants are married couple.

B. Around 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a design service contract (hereinafter “instant service contract”) with Defendant B to carry out the procedures for approval and completion of the business plan of the tourist farm business regarding the land (hereinafter “instant project”) outside the public city D and five lots (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. The Plaintiff filed an application for approval of the instant project plan (amended), permission for development activities (amended), permission for conversion of a mountainous district (amended), etc. in accordance with the instant service agreement, and received a completion inspection on May 15, 2014 from the public market through the supervision service company on the instant land after undergoing a completion inspection on the project of the mountainous district conversion consultation area in the instant land from May 23, 2014.

In addition, with respect to the instant project, the Plaintiff paid 7 million won (excluding value-added tax) at the preliminary examination cost for the Company E on behalf of the Defendants, and 3 million won (excluding value-added tax) at the supervision service cost for mountainous district conversion consultation.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 10 (including each number if there are additional numbers), and inquiry of public market, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. 1) The Defendants were both parties to the instant medicine contract, and the Plaintiff agreed to provide the service costs of KRW 35 million, and the Plaintiff performed the entire service duty. 2) The parties to the instant service contract are only Defendant B, and the oral agreed service costs are limited to KRW 25 million, and the Plaintiff did not perform the duty to obtain permission to occupy and use the road in the instant land among the service duties.

B. Determination 1 of the instant service contract is the purport of the entire evidence and pleadings, as seen earlier.