logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.06.19 2013고합133
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[Criminal Power] On July 13, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, and completed the execution of the sentence on October 5, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On August 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00 on the day before the D convenience store in C at a leisure time, and (b) on the victim E (the 15-year old age), seated behind the victim E (the 15-year old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the juvenile victim by force.

2. On April 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed theft, at Gnonobya, in Gnobya, located in F at the time of inn, resulting in the theft of KRW 2 A (5,000 at a market price) of tobacco products owned by the victim of the instant singinging transport business in the said place.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, arrested H as a flagrant offender for the foregoing reason, and transferred it to the police officer I belonging to the relevant police station.

At this time, the Defendant informed I of the name and resident registration number of J in order to avoid the fact that she was unable to attend the trial on paragraph 1 of this Article, and the Defendant notified I of the summary of the fact that she was accused, the reason for arrest, the right to appoint a defense counsel and the right to request a review of legality of arrest. The Defendant, without authority, signed the confirmation with 'J’ without authority and issued I as if she was duly formed.

At around 09:50 on April 26, 2014, the Defendant continued to present the suspect interrogation protocol in the name of J and under the name of J, after having been investigated by the police officers belonging to the above police station by informing the Defendant of the name and resident registration number as if the Defendant was J.

arrow