logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2019.01.17 2018나52610
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the counterclaim claim added by this court, shall be modified as follows.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the evidence additionally submitted in this court, which is insufficient to acknowledge the defendant's assertion, stated in the evidence Nos. 29 through 32; and (b) the testimony of the witness of this court; (c) the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used or added as follows; and (d) the plaintiff and the defendant added a "three additional judgments" as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition of the following "three additional judgments" as to the argument added by the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. On the 17th page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall be added to a part which is dismissed or added:

No. 31 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that "No. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "No. 3 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "No. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "No. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "no. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "no. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "no. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "no. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "no. 4 of the Act" shall apply to the testimony that "no. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "no. 4 of the Act" shall apply to the testimony that "no. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony that "no. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony of the Act, no. 4 of the Act shall apply to the testimony of the Act."

arrow