logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.10.06 2015고정282
예배방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of the "FIE" in Jeonnam-gun E, and Defendant B and C is the head of the same church.

1. Defendant A

A. At around 11:00 on December 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) when the Victim G, who was a pastor, talks with 30 believerss, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s snow by avoiding disturbance, i.e., teaching and delivering worships to the auditoriums; and (b) when the Victim G, who was a pastor, talks with 30 believerss, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s snow.

B. At around 13:30 on January 6, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s snow by avoiding disturbance, i.e., sending a letter to the platform and delivering worship when the victim talks with 30 believerss.

C. At around 05:00 on January 8, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s snow by avoiding disturbance, i.e., sending a letter to the platform and delivering worship when the victim talks with 30 believerss.

2. On January 6, 2013, Defendant B interfered with the victim’s snow view, such as: (a) the victim G, who was a pastor, brought the victim of the snow around 30 believers into the lower part of the lecture, at around 13:30, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s snow view.

3. Defendant C

A. At around 05:00 on January 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s snow by bringing the victim’s snow in front of 30 believerss while leaving the victim’s snow gate under the lecture room; and (b) obstructed the victim’s snow gate.

B. On January 9, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s snow, such as blocking the victim from attending the meeting of the FIIE at around 19:21, and preventing the victim who want to attend the meeting of the PIE at the bar.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 158 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes (Defendant A and C);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment is respectively;

arrow