The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative and reporter of “B(C)”, an Internet news.

On April 21, 2018, the Defendant, at the 3rd floor B office of the Seoul Building 07:42, “E,” and “E,” as the case where a reporter, who intensively covered F building problems, is employed in the Amateur, is interested in the background of the case. A cable TVer, who concentrateds on the problems of F building two years before the 2-year period, and displayed an in-depth report about 4 apex at the time. However, in 2016, H reporter, who concentrated on F building, was punished for the case where he was employed in the Ag self-public relations team of the Gu office. The issue of the G office is that he was employed in the G office, which was subject to the gathering, and was written in the G office. The issue of the G office is that the article or the work of the Gu office, which was written in the article or the work of the Gu (hereinafter “after the instant case”).

However, the victim H was regularly appointed through regular employment process through the "Public Notice of Employment Plan for Local Public Officials in 2017" announced by G-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter "G") around March 27, 2017, as well as on March 27, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant set up an article of false facts openly through the information and communication network to defame the victim, and damaged the reputation of the victim.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that the defendant did not engage in an article that does not contain a news article that has an employment visa related to the victim, but is employed by the reporter who was coveraged with the G-gu corruption related to the G-gu, is improper as the behavior of a journalist monitoring an agency of power, and thus, it is merely an article that the recruitment process is not open.

The time of the victim's employment of G-gu.