1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the plaintiff added the following judgments as to the matters alleged in the trial of the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Additional Decision-Making] The plaintiffs asserted that the employees of the Cheongsung-Madong Hospital violated their duty of due care in protecting and managing the network E, and that the network E died due to the defect in the windows, which are the facilities of the Cheongsung-Madong Hospital, and that it should be considered in the amount of consolation money.

The doctor in charge of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the mental health of the Cheongsung, as seen earlier, presented the network E’s opinion that “I would not want to die,” and that “The network E would be transferred to an open ward, or need to be closely observed.” The doctor in charge of the department of the extension and the department of the department of the department of the department of the mental health of the Cheongsung, in the situation where the network E was hospitalized in the hospital and received treatment, but the guardian did not contact with the patient, and the network E raised a complaint to the general hospital, and the reason why the network E was transferred to the general hospital, the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone, but the degree of violation of the duty to protect the employees of the Cheongsung Hospital, if there is a little degree of attention required ordinarily to the employees of the relevant medical institution, would not have any other evidence to find that there is a lack of considerable degree of harm in the situation of intention.

In addition, it is not sufficient to recognize that there is any defect in the windows installed by the Cheongsung Amsung Amsung Amnisa Hospital on the sole basis of the fact that the network E was committed suicide by removing the 7th floor of the Cheongsung Amsung Amnisa Hospital.