Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On May 28, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 4, 2014.

[Criminal facts] 2016 High 1095

1. The Defendant and B conspired with the Defendant to jointly commit the crime on November 6, 2012, with the victim D’s “E Multi-face” located in Jin-si, Jin-si, at approximately 21:00 on November 6, 2012, did not have the intent or ability to work as an employee, and they would have repaid the money borrowed from P with the advance payment to B as an employee at the multilateral loan of KRW 500,000 to B as an employee.

“A false statement” was made and the Defendant was granted KRW 5 million in advance from the injured party, and KRW 6 million in B in advance, respectively.

2. The Defendants and F Co-Crimes committed in collusion with the Defendant and F on March 7, 2013, “The facts at the office is the fact at the victim’s H”, even though they did not have the intent or ability to work as an entertainment worker at the main place of the JJ operated by the victim I, the Defendants would have to repay the money borrowed from the main place to the F with an advance payment of KRW 8,500,000,000,000,000 to the F as an employee.

“False speech” shall be made, and the above notarial office shall prepare a fair deed for the advance payment, and make joint and several sureties with each other, etc., and it was issued 8.5 million won to the Defendant under the pretext of the advance payment from the damaged party, and 8.5 million won to the F, respectively.

3. The defendant's sole criminal conduct;

A. On January 12, 2013, the Defendant against the victim K made a false statement to the victim K who operated a job placement office in the Defendant’s residence located in Gwangju-si L Building 207, the Defendant: (a) “Around January 12, 2013, the Defendant introduced the victim K, who borrowed money, to the effect that he will pay off the money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not intend to work as an employee at the same time, and the Defendant did not have any specific property at the same time and did not have any excessive obligation to borrow money from another business establishment, so even if he borrowed money from the injured party, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant.