1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for cancellation of the provisional disposition registration against Defendant K is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's defendant K. H.

1. Basic facts

A. In relation to the executor company of the instant electric power resource housing and the housing unit for the electric power resource of 1,2, and 3 complexes (hereinafter referred to as “O’s electric power resource housing”, which was newly constructed on the ground outside N of the petition-gu, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and the housing unit for the electric power resource of 1,2, and 3 complexes (hereinafter referred to as “the housing unit for the instant electric power resource”), the housing unit executor of the 1 complex is the non-party P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “P”), the housing unit executor of the 2 complex complex is the non-party company, the housing unit executor of the 3 complex electric power resource, and the Si

On the other hand, P and Q are located in the same building located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-si, and are the same company with the same shareholder composition.

B. On August 21, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a subcontract between the Plaintiff and P with the content that each of the construction costs for reinforced concrete construction of the instant electric power resource housing was set at KRW 779,00,000, KRW 662,000, KRW 2,000, KRW 3,000, KRW 619,000, KRW 3,000, KRW 3,000, housing for electric power resource.

(hereinafter “instant construction contract”). C.

1) The Plaintiff completed the instant construction contract and completed the additional construction, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,324,00,000. However, P paid KRW 1,320,000,000 out of the said construction contract, and the Plaintiff exercised the right of retention. 2) The Nonparty Company, on September 26, 2016, prepared and issued to the Plaintiff a written confirmation of payment of construction cost and an authentic deed, which directly pays KRW 1,00,000 to the Plaintiff by October 30, 2016.

The non-party company transferred possession of the entire house of this case from the plaintiff 1, such as transfer of ownership of the entire house of this case by the non-party company, after concluding a sales contract with the defendants as shown in the following table 1.