The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as the victim’s statement, the victim’s part of the damage, and the written diagnosis of injury, the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged can be fully recognized.

However, the court below rendered a not guilty verdict on this part of the facts charged, and the judgment of the court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (a sum of KRW 300,000) is too unhued and unfair.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. On June 26, 2015, at around 17:50, the Defendant: (a) brought a dispute with the victim E (33) who is not adequate to be appraised due to a usual parking problem on the front side of the D in Pakistan; (b) while spiting the victim’s face while spiting the victim’s chest on the victim’s face; and (c) spiting the victim’s chest, spiting the victim’s chest on the victim’s face; and (d) spiting the victim’s chest on the victim’s face, the Defendant spited the victim’s chest and spited the victim’s chest, which requires treatment for about 20 days.

나. 원심의 판단 원심은, 사건 당시 피해자의 가슴 부위를 촬영한 사진( 증거기록 제 13 쪽) 을 보면, 피고인이 사건 당시 소지한 싸인 펜에 긁혀서 입은 상처로 보기 어렵고, 끝이 뾰족 한 물건에 긁힌 상처라고 보이는데, 이 정도의 심한 상처가 나려면 당시 피해자가 입고 있던 옷도 상당부분 찢기거나 훼손되는 것이 경험칙에 부합하나, 사진에 찍힌 피해자의 옷에는 별다른 훼손이 보이지 않으므로, 피고 인의 싸인 펜으로 인하여 상해를 입었다는 피해자의 진술을 믿기 어렵고, 기왕증의 가능성을 배제할 수 없으므로 위 공소사실 기재 상해가 피고 인의 폭행으로 발생하였다는 점이 합리적 의심의 여지가 없을 정도로 증명되었다고

On the ground that it is difficult to see this part of the facts charged, it is judged not guilty.