logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2014.07.09 2013가단33968
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each statement in the evidence Nos. 3 through 8 of the facts constituting the basis for the appeal, the fact that D was elected as the president of the association at the ordinary meeting of the urban environment rearrangement project association C (hereinafter “instant association”) on September 11, 2010 can be recognized.

2. The party's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion asserts that the defendant is obligated to pay 40 million won (property damage KRW 29 million) to the plaintiff as compensation for damages caused by the tort on the following grounds:

1) On September 11, 2010, the Plaintiff, as the president of the instant association, entered into a service contract with the Defendant to collect a written resolution for the purpose of demanding a written resolution from the general meeting of shareholders on September 11, 2010, where 10 public relations personnel of the Defendant collected a written resolution for seven days and submit a daily activity report, and to pay 11,90,000 won to the Defendant in return for submitting the daily activity report, and ordered the Defendant to supplement the contract.

B) However, the defendant did not comply with the plaintiff's order of supplement and received a written resolution issued by public relations personnel to D without receiving it from the office of the association of this case without receiving the written resolution issued by the public relations personnel, which was replaced by the other party candidate D, and then received it on the day when he knew who was drafted and submitted the written report, and the defendant's public relations personnel conspiredd with F, G, H, and I's written resolution to E box and interfered with verification for eight months. (C) The defendant participated in the above illegal election, thereby allowing the plaintiff who was elected in the above election to collect a written resolution between the plaintiff where the head of the association of this case was the head of the association of this case. (2) Although the defendant collected a written resolution between the plaintiff where the head of the association of this case was the head of the association of this case, the defendant's representative director was the defendant's written resolution by the defendant.

arrow