Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On February 7, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for three years and a fine of 1.4 billion won at the Seoul Northern District Court for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (tax) and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 29, 2020.

On January 8, 2020, the Defendant used a computer in the Defendant’s residence located in building B C at the Namyang-si, Seoul Northern District Court on December 17, 2019, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the instant case, such as violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (tax) against Gohap 12, 2018 at the above Seoul Northern District Court on December 17, 2019, and issued a false tax invoice by the Defendant, despite the fact that the Defendant Nonparty was operating the Dispute Resolution Committee and issued the false tax invoice by the Dispute Resolution Committee E, the Defendant issued the said false tax invoice by himself.

After preparing a written complaint stating "," the same day has been submitted to the public service center of the Namyang-gu Police Station located in Chuncheon 532 in South-do on the same day.

After that, on January 21, 2020, the Defendant was investigated by the complainant in the investigation of the Seoul Yangyang-ju Police Station and the facts of Article 4, and “After the Defendant Nonparty appeared as a witness of the above case, the Defendant Nonparty issued all the false tax invoices of the GU and the KUE, and the complainant did not operate each of the above companies and issued the false tax invoice, despite the absence of the fact that the complainant issued the false tax invoice, the Defendant is a false tax invoice without any actual transaction between H.

The question, “Any example to, and all to, the question, I followed.”

It shall be raised as "," and it shall be required that "E was a company which was operated by any person at the time."

“A” for the question “A”.

It is essential to memory as to who was entitled to issue and receive the tax account statement of the E in question.

The question “A” is hot.

This is because I has submitted a paper that has been issued by A when I results in an investigation at a secondary tax office.

what is the corporate tax invoice.