logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.18 2015고단6239
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 11, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of suspension of execution and fine of KRW 930,00,000 for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (such as issuance of false tax invoices) by the Daegu High Court, which became final and conclusive on February 9, 2017.

【The premise fact-finding C denied the crime that, on August 26, 2013, when Defendant A was charged with violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act in the Daegu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on the grounds that: (a) Defendant A’s place of business was leased from Defendant A to the name of “F” from June 5, 2009 to November 17, 2010; and (b) Defendant A prepared and delivered a false tax invoice amounting to KRW 286,595,650 (hereinafter “the instant tax invoice”) equivalent to the total supply amount on six occasions without any transaction of goods or services; and (c) Defendant A was not issued a false tax invoice; and (d) Defendant A was actually supplied with a high scrap metal and issued a tax invoice.

[Defendant A] On January 24, 2014, Defendant A attended and testified as a witness in a case of violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act with respect to the above court 2013 senior 1046 senior 10,000, which was held in 39, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, in the first instance court for the case of violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act against the above court 2013 senior 1046 senior 1046 senior, Defendant A. The defense counsel’s “the witness” was supplied from the defense counsel over the amount of KRW 41,160,00 on April 20, 201; KRW 32,574,500 on May 14, 2010; KRW 40,000 on May 19, 2010; KRW 50,154,000 on May 26, 2010; KRW 758,584,508

The answer to the question "...", and the witness " shall have received the scrap metal from the defendant and remitted the price of the goods to the passbook in the name of the defendant."

The answer to the question “..”, and the witness “in fact made the scrap metal transaction with the Defendant.”

The answer to the question "...", and the prosecutor's "witness and the defendant".

arrow