1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2008Gahap12680 decided Dec. 2, 2008 regarding the return of unjust enrichment against the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff is a reconstruction maintenance and improvement project association organized for the reconstruction of the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government A Apartment, and the remainder Defendants and the network X except Defendant R, S, T, U, and V are those who were the members of each Plaintiff, and Defendant R, S, T, U, and V are the children of the network X, and the heir who inherited the network X with the share of 1/5 shares of inheritance as of February 1, 2014.

B. 1) The Plaintiff’s decision to recommend reconciliation in this case (hereinafter “the Defendant”) is abbreviationd from July 8, 2007 to August 29, 2007 under the management and disposition plan stipulated in the Plaintiff’s extraordinary general meeting, with the exception of Defendant R, S, T, U, and V (hereinafter “Defendant”).

2) Each sales contract (hereinafter referred to as “each sales contract of this case”) between partners including the network X and partners.

(2) On August 19, 208, the Plaintiff asserted that there was no obligation to pay the charges and late payment charges. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for the return of unjust enrichment that was already paid under the court’s 2008Gahap12680, and that the court paid to Defendant B 3,830,490, and 39,263,770, 260, 2680, and 2660, 360, 268, 250, 360, 360, 268, 250, 360, 268, 250, 360, 268, 360, 2500, 268, 360, 2506, 205, 306, 3605, 257, 207, 467, 2757, 257, 2757, 201.