1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Basic Facts

A. S,O, S,V, and W were each circumstances on August 16, 1913 by the Plaintiffs, Defendant D, G, and I, but the transfer of ownership was not completed separately, and Q was a real estate acquired by X and completed the registration of transfer of ownership. At Seopopo City L, N, R, T, U were real estate after X purchased and completed the registration of transfer of ownership. The real estate acquired and completed the registration of transfer of ownership by L, N, R, T, and I, the type of net AB, which is the part of the Defendant D, G, and I.

B. Defendant D completed the registration of ownership transfer on January 1, 1985 with respect to M,O, S, V, W, P, and Q from X in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Transfer of Real Estate Ownership, etc. (hereinafter “Special Measures Act”), which was enforced at that time on August 11, 2006, for P, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on January 1, 1985 with respect to L, N, R, T, and U (hereinafter “each of the instant real property”) from AB as to P, N, R, T, and Q (hereinafter “each of the instant real property”) for gift on January 1, 1960.

C. Since then, Defendant D completed the registration of transfer of ownership for P/O to Defendant G, for P/O to Defendant B, for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L, for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/L for P/

On the other hand, the network X has AB, AA, and AC, a son, and the deceased on December 31, 1941, and the deceased on December 31, 194, the network AB solely succeeded to the network X as the householder.

The network AB died on August 28, 1958 and succeeded to the network AB solely as the successor of the family.

The network AE and the network AF are children, and the mother is Defendant D, G, I, etc., the her mother is AG, and the mother is AH, the plaintiffs, etc.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1, 2, 5, 6, Eul's statements in Gap's 1 to 4 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the whole argument of the plaintiffs' arguments in the purport of the whole argument, Gap's assertion AB is a de facto loss.