logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1995. 5. 9. 선고 95도696 판결
[특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(약취유인),직업안정법위반,강제추행][공1995.6.15.(994),2147]
Main Issues

The starting point of calculating the period of filing a complaint by a victim who had no capacity to file a complaint at the time of crime

Summary of Judgment

Even if the victim of an indecent act by compulsion filed a suit more than six months after the day on which he became aware of the offender, if the victim was only a juvenile under the age of 11 and was unable to file a complaint at the time of the complaint, the period of complaint should be calculated from the time when the victim became incapable of filing a complaint. As such, the period of complaint does not expire.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 230(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Reference Cases

[Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee] Plaintiff 1 and 1 other (Law Firm Han, Attorneys Park Dong-young et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant-appellant-appellee)

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney Kim Kim-hwan

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 94No3534 delivered on February 22, 1995

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The number of detention days after an appeal shall be included in the punishment for each crime under Articles 2, 3, 4, and 5 when the original adjudication is made for 70 days.

Reasons

The defendant and his state appointed defense counsel's grounds of appeal are also examined.

According to the reasoning of the judgment below and the judgment of the court of first instance as cited by the court below, each crime committed against the defendant including the crime of indecent act by compulsion can be recognized, and there is no error of law or misapprehension of legal principles that found facts without any incomplete deliberation or evidence. As to the act of indecent act by compulsion under Article 1-A(b) of the judgment below, it is pointed out that the victim filed a complaint six months after the date on which the victim became aware of the offender. However, according to the records, the victim was merely a juvenile under the age of 11 at the time of the crime and did not have the ability to file a complaint at the time of the crime, so the period of the complaint should be calculated from the time of the occurrence of the ability to file a complaint. Thus, the period of filing a complaint shall not be deemed to have expired. All arguments are without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed, and part of the number of days of pre-trial detention after the appeal is to be included in the punishment for each crime of No. 2, 3, 4, and 5 at the time of the original adjudication. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Justices Lee Don-hee (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1995.2.22.선고 94노3534