A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 20, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) around 04:40 on October 20, 2015, and (b) on the issue of having the victim D and receipt, which is a female employee, got in dispute with the Defendant; (b) “In this weather year, the Defendant was placed on the Internet as an inferior business establishment; (c) took a video image with a cell phone; and (d) interfered with the victim’s business restaurant by taking a disturbance for about one hour, including: (a) “nickly, not to be taken; and (b) no funeral service is provided; and (c) the Defendant continued to stop the operation of the victim’s business restaurant for about one hour.

2. On October 20, 2015, from around 04:47 to around 05:59, the Defendant damaged public goods, despite the police officer’s control, who received a report at the front entrance of a restaurant as stated in the above paragraph (1) for about one hour and 12 minutes, he/she interfered with his/her duties, and continuously reported by the injured party, and he/she went on the roadway to the road, “I do not leave without going to go to go to go to go to the road.” On two occasions, the Defendant repeated the Defendant’s use of the public goods to go to the center of the road, by going to go to the road. Since the police officer took necessary measures by forcing the traffic accident risks, he/she took the necessary measures by cutting the entrance to the back seat of the EAWD 112 patrol, and by cutting it out several times to the front seat of the vehicle, thereby destroying the vehicle patrol board, repairing the vehicle, repairing the vehicle, repairing the vehicle, and destroying it to the right level of 1,578.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to goods for public use) and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is the observation of protection and the community service order.