Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2018. 10. 13. 19:05 경 서울 용산구 C에 있는 인도에 술에 취한 채 누워 있던 중 신고를 받고 출동한 서울 용산 경찰서 소속 방범 순찰 대원 수경 D가 다가가자, 발로 위 D의 왼쪽 정강이를 3회 차고, 이를 말리는 위 소속 방범 순찰 대원 E의 오른쪽 정강이를 1회 찼으며, “야 이 씨 발 새끼야 ”라고 욕설을 하면서 머리로 위 소속 방범 순찰 대장 F의 턱 부위를 1회 들이받아 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and the maintenance of order by the members of the crime prevention patrol group.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph 1, attempted to cover an influorious electricity that was entered in front of the police, other than the foregoing E’s police team, and damaged an influorous repair cost by breaking the antenna part.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, E, and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing nonelectric photographs destroyed;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 141 (1) (a point of hindering the performance of official duties) of the relevant Act on the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each fine for the selection of punishment (the first offender, the fact that the crime is recognized and considered in depth, and the fact that the attitude of violence is not serious);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;