logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.18 2014고단9648
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From June 2014, the Defendant was equipped with 10 marinas, 10 shower rooms, 2 female employees accommodation, etc. in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, and 3, and was in charge of operating and managing business establishments according to D and E’s instructions at F (hereinafter “instant business establishments”).

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.), along with D and E, directed G, H and I to engage in sexual intercourse against the customers of the instant business establishment from among the married women of the instant business establishment, from July 3, 2014 to August 5, 2014, to find out the location of the instant business establishment from around KRW 80,00 to around KRW 90,00,000, and to have G, H and I provide sexual intercourse with the customers.

Accordingly, the defendant conspiredd with D, etc. to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. A massage who violates the Medical Service Act shall be qualified as a person from among visually impaired persons, who satisfies specific requirements, and shall not be qualified as a inseminator for profit-making purposes;

Nevertheless, the Defendant employed J, K, L, etc., which is female women of the Thailand, who did not obtain the recognition of a massage club in accordance with D’s instructions, as female female employees of the instant business establishment. From June 27, 2014 to August 5, 2014, the Defendant collected fees of KRW 80,000 to KRW 90,00 from the customers who found the instant business establishment from around June 27, 2014, and had them take care of the body of the customers by taking advantage of hand, arms, blusssss, etc., or by taking charge of harming them.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with female employees such as D, E, and J, did not obtain the recognition of Marine for profit.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Immigration Control Act is exempt from the visa (B-1) to a foreigner of Thailand nationality at the same time and time as that set forth in the preceding paragraph, according to D’s instructions.

arrow