All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In light of the judgment, the fact that the Defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected it, and that the damage was relatively heavy, etc., but the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that he/she was punished several times for the same kind of crime, etc., and that he/she did not agree with the victims, etc. is disadvantageous.

In addition, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the judgment below, and considering all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, since the sentence of the court below is too heavy or it seems unfair because it is too heavy, the above assertion by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure is to be corrected as deletion of the appeal made by the defendant and the prosecutor in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.