All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In light of the means, results, scale, frequency, etc. of each of the instant crimes, etc., each of the instant crimes is disadvantageous to the Defendant, and the victims do not wish to punish the Defendant, and it appears that the actual benefits earned by the Defendant are not significant due to each of the instant crimes, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

In addition, considering the circumstances leading up to each of the instant crimes, circumstances after the commission of the crime, Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or it cannot be deemed unfair because it is too heavy. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since the part of Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act No. 4 [1230 [Attachment 1230] of the 7-A of the judgment below is obvious that the part "for the victim K" of Article 25(1) of the 7-A of the 7-A is a clerical error of "the victim H.