A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On September 28, 2010, the Defendant, at around 17:00 on September 28, 2010, falsely stated that “300,000 won will be paid on the side of the week from which the victim C is driving back to the harmony of Gyeonggi-do, while boarding the 7th apartment way in front of the 7th apartment road operated by the victim C.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi charges to the victim because of no particular property or income.

The defendant got the victim to board the defendant and go to and from the way to the front of the Ethic City in ethic City.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, has acquired property benefits equivalent to 300,000 won.

B. On October 5, 2010, at the front of a bus terminal located in the original city-based city-based city-based city-based around 15:30 on October 5, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant 400,000 won per week while operating a taxi to Ulsansan, and 300,000 won per previous taxi operation fee.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee to the victim as above.

The Defendant had the victim board the Defendant and operate the Defendant to the point where his address is unknown.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, has acquired property benefits equivalent to 400,000 won.

2. On October 26, 2010, around 15:30 on October 26, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the victim B’s G office where the victim B works in the Won-si F, “If the victim seeks to purchase clothes in the Internet shopping mall instead of wanting to purchase clothes, it will be paid in cash later.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if the victim wants to purchase the goods instead of the clothing because there is no particular property or income.

The Defendant, through the Internet shopping mall, purchased clothing, etc. equivalent to a total of KRW 277,400 in the market value through the Internet shopping mall in its place, and had the victim settle it by credit card.