Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

From July 1, 2004, the Defendant had registered a business and opened a credit card merchant in Daegu Northern-gu D with the trade name of “Epactors”, and operated the imposed hospital.

On January 9, 2012, the Defendant, while operating the foregoing hospital, opened a business registration and a credit card merchant under the name “H” in the name of the Defendant’s mother, G, the mother of the Defendant, on January 9, 2012, 201, with the intention of reducing taxes, and, at the same time, had the “H” credit card settlement terminal installed in the said hospital, and had the said hospital customers present a credit card in order to calculate the amount of use, such as skin, etc., the Defendant was willing to pay by using the said “H” credit card settlement terminal.

On January 2012, the Defendant received a credit card from the customers with no name from the above hospital and settled KRW 201 case 9,334,000 using the above “H” credit card settlement terminal, etc. from around that time to December 2014, the Defendant made a transaction by credit card in the name of another credit card merchant by settling the total amount of KRW 462,271,00,000 using the above “H” credit card settlement terminal, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusations, credit card computation slips, general taxable persons' value-added tax returns, each investigation report (in relation to the preparation of a business registration certificate, attachment of a business registration certificate, and a list of crimes, and the difference in sales in

1. Article 70(2)3 of the former Specialized Credit Finance Business Act (Amended by Act No. 13068, Jan. 20, 2015); Articles 19(4)3 and 19(4)3 of the former Specialized Credit Finance Business Act; the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act shall be made using the name of another credit card merchant by the accused;