A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant's written indictment on February 18, 2015 is clear that " February 18, 2014" is a clerical error.

At around 02:38, in the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District, three police officers, such as the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District of the C District, who tried to make a statement at any time and tried to enter the C district.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Report on Arrest of Suspect, the application of the ctv video photographic statute;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be made again for the reason of sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that: (a) the police officer’s chest is not good to the nature of the crime of this case, and as a result, the police officer seems to have caused considerable maternity; and (b) the defendant, under the influence of alcohol, who is not good to know about the facts notified in the course of arresting a traffic crime and commits the crime; (c) the defendant should care for him/her in mind; (d) the defendant should take care of him/her more favorable circumstances, such as the fact that he/she has no record of criminal punishment except for the two-time penalties; and (e) other favorable conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the fact that he/she has no record of criminal punishment other than the criminal records of this case.