logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.06.03 2013고정564
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 08:50 on January 19, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C and D: (a) was satisfing the victim C, a female living together with the Defendant, at the Defendant’s home located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, 103 (hereinafter “C”), and was satisfing the victim’s head, sating the victim’s head, sating the satisfing, cutting the satfing, drinking the satfing face, sating the satfing face, and head satfing the victim’s growth who met the above victim’s face, satfing the victim’s face, and head sat at around 14 days for treatment; (b) was satfing the victim C, satching the satisfing part, etc., requiring approximately 3 weeks treatment.

2. On January 19, 2013, at the same place as the above 1.10:10 on January 19, 2013, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim F, on the ground that the victim F (the age of 26) heard the horses that the victim F (the age of 26) was assaulted by the Defendant, and assaulted the Defendant, such as the victim’s chest part on a hand, and the victim’s bridge was inflicted on the victim, such as the right-side satisfaction, the right-hand part, the left-hand part, and the front left-hand part, which require the victim’s treatment for two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement of each police suspect interrogation protocol against D or F;

1. Statement made to C by the police statement;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (F), the injury diagnosis certificate (D), and the injury diagnosis certificate (C);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for detention in the workhouses are as follows: (a) the Defendant agreed with the victim C during the instant trial proceeding; (b) the Defendant acknowledges and reflects all of his mistake at the latest and later; and (c) the balance of influence between the parties concerned, such as F, etc., shall be determined by the sentence as ordered

arrow