logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.04.02 2012고단351
변호사법위반등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

(a) No person, other than an attorney-at-law, shall engage in preparation of legal documents and other legal affairs in return for money and valuables;

Nevertheless, around February 1, 2010, the defendant made an application for a payment order with the content that D would pay D 9,880,000 won against E and F at his own house located in Western-gun C around February 1, 2010.

The Defendant received KRW 450,00 from D in return for the preparation of the above application.

After that, on February 1, 2010, the defendant filed an application for the above payment order with the District Court of Jeonju and the District Court of the Branch Court of the Eup.

As a result, the defendant was not an attorney-at-law and dealt with legal affairs such as preparing legal documents.

(2) On October 11, 2010, the Defendant: (a) drafted a complaint for a claim for a loan of KRW 5 million against D from its home to E and F; and (b) drafted and filed a complaint with D to the effect that D files a complaint for forging a private document and uttering of a falsified document against E and F.

The defendant was given KRW 400,000 as the price for the preparation of the above documents on the job.

As a result, the defendant was not an attorney-at-law and dealt with legal affairs such as preparing legal documents.

(3) Around October 11, 2010, the Defendant was above at his home.

When the judgment of the first instance court against D was rendered in the lawsuit pending with the application for the payment order stated in the paragraph, the petition of appeal was prepared to the effect that D was cancelled, and the petition was sent to D.

The Defendant received KRW 450,00 from D in return for the delivery of KRW 450,00 from D.

As a result, the defendant was not an attorney-at-law and dealt with legal affairs such as preparing legal documents.

(4) Around October 19, 2010, the Defendant was at his home.

The amendment shall be prepared with respect to the petition of appeal to replace the appellee with F1 in relation to the petition of appeal to be entered in the paragraph.

arrow