logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.03 2016누50350
손실보상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

A. The Plaintiffs are the owners of each land indicated in the “land subject to accommodation” in the attached Table [Attachment 1] (hereinafter “each land of this case”; and when individually named each land, the Plaintiffs are the owners of each land of this case according to the sequences.

B. Business Approval and Public Notice - Pyeongtaek-si G business [H First and Second Business] (hereinafter referred to as each of the above business “the First Business” and “the Second Business” and “the Project in this case” collectively): The Public Notice of Gyeonggi-do on December 5, 2013 and the Public Notice of Gyeonggi-do on May 29, 2014 - The Defendant:

C. Each expropriation ruling rendered on December 23, 2014 (hereinafter “each expropriation ruling”) by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal (hereinafter “each expropriation ruling”): The first project (Plaintiff B, C, D, and E) of this case - Land subject to compensation: The amount indicated in the column for “amount of expropriation” Nos. 1 through 10 of the attached Table 1 [Attachment Table 1] - Compensation: The starting date of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation on February 6, 2015 - The second project (PlaintiffF) of this case: An appraisal corporation on February 6, 2015 - An appraisal corporation and a two appraisal corporations (hereinafter “Appraisal Corporation”) - The second project subject to compensation: the amount indicated in the column for “amount of expropriation” in the attached Table 11 and 12.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation for a corporation and a Pacific appraisal corporation for a corporation on February 6, 2015;

D. The Central Land Tribunal rendered each objection on June 25, 2015 (hereinafter “each objection”) - Contents of the adjudication: Compensation for losses for each land of this case was modified as indicated in the attached Table 1.

- An appraisal corporation 1) The primary business of this case: An appraisal corporation at sight and a joint appraisal corporation 2) The second business of this case: An appraisal corporation at Alban and an appraisal corporation at one appraisal corporation

E. The result of the commission of appraisal to K by the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as “court appraisal”) - Contents of appraisal: attached Table 2.

arrow