A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car.

1. On December 9, 2015, when the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking without a license), the Defendant driven the said rocketing or other car without obtaining a driver’s license while under the influence of alcohol leveling approximately 0.133% of alcohol level in the king 14km, from the king, up to the king Chang Dom-gu Dom-si 38rd on the 38th road.

2. On December 9, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escapeing vehicle) driven the said rocketing car with a alcohol level of 0.133% while under the influence of alcohol during blood without obtaining a driver’s license on December 14:50, 2015, and proceeded to the speed of about 60km per hour when the Defendant is demoted from the direction of a police station toward the south of the modern intersection of the Gyeonggi-gu.

At the time of the defendant's electric power failure, the victim D (n, 46 years old) and E X-ray car driven by this 46 years old and entered the above three-distance to turn to the left to the police box on the right side of the modern bridge, so in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the driver while keeping the above X-ray car in good manner.

Nevertheless, as a result of the Defendant’s neglect of duties under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant did not regard the victim’s access to the third distance, and entered the third distance as it is, and was found to have received the front part of the said x-ray car as the front part of the said x-ray car.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant had the above victim receive a salt and tension for about two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence, the Defendant stopped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;