Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2013, at Jeju, the victim C(n, 78 years of age) had expressed a desire to D when the defendant's spouse D and money issues. On January 20, 2013, the defendant infringed upon the victim's residence by finding out the victim's house in E in the house of the victim in Jeju, and entering the house in the open gate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the witness C’s testimony Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Selection of a fine;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The punishment shall be determined as per the Disposition in consideration of all the following circumstances as a result of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The fact of a crime is recognized, the victim's reason, circumstances after the crime was committed, and the part not guilty of the previous criminal records of the defendant;

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case, including the summary of the facts charged, stated as follows: “The Defendant found the victim C’s house located in Jeju-si, on January 15, 2013, and did so more than two weeks by pushing the victim with both hands, and thereby cutting down the scarcity that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.” Accordingly, the Defendant consistently held the door door at the investigation stage and did not respond to it, but did not respond to it even though the victim saw the victim’s son’s son her her her f, and did not follow it.” The Defendant asserted as follows: “The Defendant continued to her her f with his her her her her her f, and did not go against it by violence, and there was no fact that the victim was pushed up with his her her f, as shown in the facts charged.”

2. Determination

A. (i) The victim testified in the court to the effect that “I did not cause physical fightings after I go beyond the Defendant’s body” as follows, but the police stated that “I am flicks after I am flicks after I am flicks. I am flicks. I am flicks. I am flicks.”