1. The lower court held that the Defendant is liable for a fine of KRW 5 million for a crime stated in the facts constituting an offense set forth in 2017 order and 3652.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On January 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for at least ten months and two years of suspended execution on the grounds that he/she intruded with a structure at night in Busan District Court.

2. 4. The ruling becomes final and conclusive and is currently during the period of that suspended execution.

[2] On June 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 08:12, 2017, the Defendant: (b) opened a door door-to-door bus stop near the Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, Young-do; (c) opened a door-to-door door-to-door door-to-door bus stop located in the Dong-dong, Busan; and (d) removed a paper-to-face bag containing KRW 798,000, in cash owned by the victim of the collision; and (e) cut off one bag from the door-to-face.

around 13:00 on October 1, 201, the Defendant: “H operated by the Victim G located in Busan Young-gu, Busan, the Defendant: (a) laid down a bank with the market price of MP3 lux, earphone 1, automobile keys, approximately KRW 2,000, which is the victim’s market price located in the top of the line; and (b) caused a theft. The gist of evidence [the summary of evidence 2017 Go-gu 3652]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each report on internal investigation (referring to one thousand won, three, five times a year);

1. Protocols of seizure (voluntary submission), list of seizure (2017 high order 4787);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. A report on the occurrence of a crime, a log in a field, CCTV photographs, and an appraisal report (the records of the crime as indicated in the judgment);

1. A written inquiry about each criminal history, etc. (A);

1. Investigation report (verification of previous records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the fact that a case is pending and the fact that the case is ex post facto concurrent crimes);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the selection of each fine for the crime in relation to each provision of the same Act and each provision of the same Act;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, other than the records of the crime as indicated in the judgment, the Defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months on September 18, 2008, with prison labor for larceny, etc. and six months on January 5, 2010, with prison labor for six months on a night building intrusion larceny. In addition, the Defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months on January 5, 2010.