logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.04.20 2016고단3787
절도등
Text

Defendant is sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of 2016 order 6760 and the crimes of 1 and 2 attached table 7895 order of 2016 order.

Reasons

(c) A protocol concerning suspect of the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Protocol of seizure: "2016 Highest 7895";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the defendant in the fifth public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police;

1. Each statement;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. A report on the results of identification and reply to each request for appraisal;

1. Investigative report (net 32), "2016 Highest 8122";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the defendant in the fifth public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Investigation report (netly 12) (criminal records);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the 2016 Highest 7895 Highest 7895 inquiry and investigation reporting (including evidence attached thereto at the end of 30 times, attached thereto);

1. As to the facts constituting an offense, Article 329 of the Criminal Act (absent point, choice of imprisonment), Article 319(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 330 of the Criminal Act (absent charge of larceny of a structure at night), Article 330 of the Criminal Act (absent charge of larceny of a structure at night) of the same Act, and Article 330 of the Criminal Act (absent charge of larceny of a structure at night) * In light of the results of sentencing assessment, etc., it is not deemed that the time of each of the instant offenses as indicated in the instant judgment did not change things or lack the ability to make decisions. Accordingly, the foregoing assertion is rejected.

1. Concurrent Handling: Article 37 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Korea: Theft of 2016 order 6760 order above, 2016 order order Nos. 1 and 2 of 7895 order of 2016 order order, and intrusion larceny of a night structure which becomes final and conclusive in the judgment below, provided that Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Code shall apply;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: The name of larceny of the second half of 6760 decided as 2016, the trade name of the annexed 1 and 2 of the second half of 7895 decided as 2016, and the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among the remaining crimes as stated in the ruling;

1. The grounds for sentencing (in cases where the scope of liability for compensation is not clear) under Article 32(1) and Article 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits, etc. of Application for Compensation Orders [the remaining crimes of the judgment] 1 of the crime / [the scope of recommended punishment / [the scope of punishment ] the mitigation area (8 months to 1 year and 6 months) of the mitigation area (the special mitigation person].

arrow